Information-Seeking Behaviors & Concepts
Describe the fundamental concepts of information-seeking behaviors and how they should be considered when connecting individuals or groups with accurate, relevant and appropriate information.

“Individuals will consult different sources & use different forms of communication to meet their
information needs, based upon their circumstance & individual situation.”
– Connaway, Silipigni, et al. (2011), If It Is Too Inconvenient, I’m Not
Going After It

Evidence
INFO 200 – Information Needs Blog Post
In this blog post, I explored the information needs and reading habits of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing community. In 2011, an article in the Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education stated that 50% of 18-year-olds were reading above the fourth-grade level, a situation that has changed little over the past several decades (Marschark, Sarchet, et al., p. 61). Understanding how the deaf community communicates and their mindset and values can be vital in aiding this community in their search for information. According to Talja, Keso & Pietiläinen (1999), information-seeking does not only consist of behavioral tendencies but also of the meanings and values people attach to their information-seeking practices.
According to Norton & Kovalik (1992), an awareness of the variety of communication modes used by deaf people will help hearing librarians better interact with deaf patrons. As an information professional, striving to be aware and understanding will help the deaf community feel more welcome and less anxious about approaching staff with their questions. Though not everyone in the Deaf and Hard of Hearing community is fluent in American Sign Language (ASL), having a basic understanding of ASL or a capability of “finger spelling” the alphabet can aid in bridging the communication gap. Because of reliance on a visual learning style, captioned films and videos are a significant means of access for the deaf community (Norton & Kovalik, 1992). Having these information formats available online, along with offering one-on-one Zoom or in-person reference interview meetings can help the deaf community feel more at ease and will hopefully inspire them to utilize the library resources more.
INFO 210 – LibGuide & Reflection
For this assignment, I had the opportunity to create a LibGuide for a specific information community and write a reflection about my process and research. The community I chose was botanizers or individuals who study plants in their natural habitat and are also patrons of the San Jose State University Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (King) library. I focused on species of native wildflowers in the southern California region. Botanizing is considered more of an amateur hobby and pastime, though there are scientists who specialize in botany, and are known as Botanists. Though most casual botanizers might roam their nearby neighborhood, more dedicated botanizers make special trips to unknown areas to find specific wildflowers and plants (Keeney, 1992). This requires knowledge about exploring nature, being safe, and being aware of not only the plants but also the wildlife that populates the area of interest. Some plants and animals could potentially be dangerous and even toxic. Botanizers must also be aware of the ‘Wildflower Etiquette’ and the U.S. Forest Service guidelines and laws about the gathering of plants and wildflowers. I tried to include a well-rounded variety of resources including photos, articles, book recommendations, phone apps, and social media links.
I did my best to keep the LibGuide layout simple, while also presenting all of the essential information. LibGuides that offer a good balance of “aesthetics, practicality, and usability are more effective— essentially, attractive things work better— their attractiveness produces positive emotions, which causes mental processes to be more creative and more capable of working” (Dobbs & Sittler, 2013). Having dabbled in web design, I opted for a symmetrical page layout, putting eye-catching information and photos on the left. Since we read from left to right, hopefully, this would make patrons’ eyes travel across the page to the other information provided, while being aesthetically pleasing. I ended up with five tabs total, which I tried to put in logical order: first explaining what botanizing is, discussing tips and tools for botanizing, providing information on wildflower etiquette, discussing botanizing safely, and lastly, some quick facts about the state flower. I decided to put phrases for the tab titles instead of just putting a single word, hopefully, making it more engaging for users.
INFO 220 – Information Seeking Behaviors of Art Students
During this discussion, I explored the kinds of skills, abilities, practices, and critical thinking that are utilized in library instruction for studio art/design courses. I also examined the opportunities and challenges of working with art and design students, and how they might differ from library instruction for art history courses, or in disciplines outside of the visual arts. According to the ARLIS/NA (2017) art & design, schools are the third most frequent information professional setting after colleges/universities and museums/museum libraries.
Studio art critiques are brought up as a good method for art librarians to collaborate with faculty to help students develop lifelong information literacy and critical thinking skills (Garcia & Peterson, 2017). Having participated in art critiques as an undergrad, it would have been beneficial to have been able to collaborate with a liaison/art librarian when conducting research for assignments. When searching for artistic inspiration I would use Google or draw upon media that I enjoyed consuming. I wonder what the outcome would have been if I had someone to guide me through the process. Another great resource for students is the special collections themselves, which can offer opportunities for enhancing and increasing the acquisition of subject-specific knowledge and skills; which can be used as a source of material, technical and historical knowledge, and serve as inspiration (Crilly, et al., 2017).
Conclusion
In closing, information professionals who understand the information needs and behaviors of users in specific organizations and communities are better prepared to assist with research. By observing these information behaviors, professionals can conduct formal evaluations of library services to improve them. Going forward, I will utilize these theories to guide patrons in their information-searching and provide authoritative, current, and relevant resources.
Introduction
As humans, we are constantly needing, seeking, and evaluating information. Information-seeking is the conscious effort to acquire information in response to a knowledge gap, an information need is a recognition that the knowledge you currently have is inadequate, and information behavior refers to passive and active behaviors when finding, using, or avoiding information (Case, 2018). An information need is as diverse as information users themselves.
Each user or information community possesses different characteristics that radically change their searching behavior including literacy level, geographic location, relational factors, stigmas, and task-specific factors (such as how urgently a user needs the information) (Hirsh, 2022). Information professionals should strive to conduct formal evaluations of library services, which should include analyzing the needs and behaviors of the various communities that utilize their organization’s resources. By adopting this approach, professionals can offer better guidance, more impactful programming, and equal access to resources for marginalized information communities.
Information Needs
Information-seeking is conducted in response to a recognition of a knowledge gap, referred to as a need. Individuals needing information may not seek it out due to a lack of resources, do not recognize their need as being one, do not believe their need can be addressed through information sources, or have determined that the risks involved in seeking out information outweigh the benefits (Hirsh, 2022). To complicate matters further, not all information inquiries are needs-driven. Sometimes an individual stumbles upon information, such as on a social media platform. This can unfortunately lead to the dissemination of false information. Information professionals must sometimes evaluate a specific community’s need and address it through programming or workshops. For example, Los Angeles is an area full of English as a Second Language (ESL) learners, and the Los Angeles Public Library offers online and in-person tutoring for reading, writing, or conversational English skills or classes that cover English communication, grammar, and vocabulary skills.
Information Seeking Methods
Information professionals over the years have strived to understand the search behaviors and thought processes of users. These are only a few of the vast number of information-seeking models that have been implemented over the years.
Berrypicking Model
The berrypicking model is based on the theory that a search query evolves and that information is “gathered” in bits and pieces. The stages of this model include the nature of the query, the nature of the overall search process, the range of search techniques used, and the information ‘domain’ or territory where the search is conducted (Bates, 1989). Berrypicking occurs when a user adjusts their search strategy based on what works and what doesn’t. The query itself (as well as the search terms used) is continually shifting, in part or whole (Bates, 1989). An example of this technique could be browsing citation lists or footnotes to find new resources, which in turn could radically change the course of the query.
Information Search Process
Carol Kuhlthau’s Information Search Process Model (ISP) was created to test whether a person’s uncertainty decreases from the beginning to the end of the problem-solving process (Spink, & Cole, 2006). Kuhlthau (2012) theorizes that it is important to track students’ thoughts, actions, and feelings during the search process, in relation to the stages (initiation, selection, etc.) required to move on to the next task. An interesting observation that Kuhlthau has drawn from her long-term research regarding youth services in public and school libraries, is that information technology advancements have increased confusion and uncertainty. Information professionals can help remedy this problem by conducting further research and keeping up with emerging technologies. Patience and empathy should also be exercised when assisting students, especially those who are unfamiliar with information searching, through the research process.
Problem-Solving Model
Wilson’s problem-solving model is divided into four stages: problem identification, definition, resolution, and solution statement or presentation (Spink, & Cole, 2006). This model relies on the information user being aware of their need, which is also referred to as a “knowledge gap”. This is the third version of the model, with two previous iterations before it. This major revision drew upon research from a variety of fields other than information science, including decision-making, psychology, innovation, health communication, and consumer research (Wilson, 1999). Wilson discusses how information-seeking is both an active and passive activity. Sometimes, people tend to receive information from different sources (i.e. family, friends, social media) in a fragmented manner, which may confuse or frustrate users. Information professionals can alleviate this discouragement by helping users navigate the research process and develop information literacy skills.
The World Wide Web & Information Literacy
The creation and expansion of the World Wide Web have changed the way people seek information in addition to how libraries function. Informational professionals should seek to understand how people use digital libraries and information resources to evaluate how to meet user’s information needs (Hirsh, 2022). This inclination to merely browse the web instead of conducting a formal search can be misleading and lead to a user developing bad information-seeking habits. Anyone can type vague keywords into a search and browse until they find information that satisfies their inquiry (Case, 2018). However, this information may not be authoritative, or written by someone who is an expert or has authority in that field of study. This idea of authority ties into the important concept of information literacy. The American Library Association (ALA) defines information literacy as the ability to recognize when information is needed and be able to locate, evaluate, and effectively use relevant information (Case, 2018). With the rise in popularity of social media and mobile devices, misinformation is a prevalent issue on the web. Information professionals play a crucial role in fighting misinformation and providing users with the skills and knowledge to seek accurate, relevant, and authoritative resources.
References
Bates, M.J. (1989), The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320
Brinkman, S., Evans, J, Kwan, B. and Pregill, L. (2017). Census Art Information of Professionals Preliminary: Report of Findings ARLIS/NA. https://assets.noviams.com/novi-file-uploads/arlisna/pdfs-and-documents/research_and_reports/Census_PreliminaryResultReport_Feb212017.pdf
Case, D. O. (2018). Information Seeking. In K. Haycock & M.J. Romaniuk (Eds.), The portable MLIS: Insights from the experts. Libraries Unlimited.
Crilly, J, Montero, G. G. & Mahurter, S. (2017). Art documentation: Inspirational encounters: the management and use of archives and special collections in the art and design library. In P. Glassman & J. Dyki (Eds.), The Handbook of Art and Design Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302024.012
Dobbs, A.W. & Sittler, R.L (2013). Using LibGuides to Enhance Library Services: A LITA Guide, edited by Douglas Cook, American Library Association. ProQuest Ebook Central. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sjsu/detail.action?docID=1187221
Garcia, L., & Peterson, A. (2017). Who invited the librarian? Studio critiques as a site of information literacy education. Art Libraries Journal, 42(2), 73–79. doi:10.1017/alj.2017.6
Hirsh, S. (Ed.). (2022). Information services today: An introduction. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sjsu/detail.action?docID=6891082
Kuhlthau, C.C. (2012, February 15). Research Matters: The Long Reach of the Model of the Information Search Process (ISP). The Journal of Research on Libraries and Young Adults. https://www.yalsa.ala.org/jrlya/2012/02/research-matters-the-long-reach-of-the-model-of-the-information-search-process-isp/
Marschark, M., Sarchet, T., Convertino, C. M., Borgna, G., Morrison, C., & Remelt, S. (2011). Print Exposure, Reading Habits, and Reading Achievement Among Deaf and Hearing College Students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 61–74. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr044
Norton, M.J., & Kovalik, G.L. (1992). Libraries Serving an Underserved Population: Deaf and Hearing-Impaired Patrons. Introduction to Library Trends. 41(1). http://hdl.handle.net/2142/7822
Spink, A. & Cole, C. (2006). Human Information Behavior: Integrating Diverse
Approaches and Information Use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 25–35. doi: 10.1002/asi.20249
Talja, S., Keso, H., & Pietiläinen, T. (1999). The production of ‘context’ in information seeking research: A metatheoretical view. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 751-763. https://www-sciencedirect-com.libaccess.sjlibrary.org/science/article/pii/S0306457399000242
Wilson, T.D. (1999), Models in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145